Deliberation Process is a procedure that was revived by Sir/Dean Pama Muti in order to evaluate graduating students whether or not they are fitted or fated to graduate. After a semester, professors handling Fourth Year subjects will gather and evaluate their students’ performance plus their chances to the BAR Exam.
October 12 (around 10 a.m.) four professors namely Atty. Moslem for Commercial Law Review, Atty. Guiling for Remedial Law Review, Atty Norma Tanggol for Taxation Law Review and Dean Pama Muti for Civil Law Review 2 gathered to render a verdict to the 24 graduating students, the discussion was intense and scrutiny on each students’ class performance was of high magnitude. Each student is evaluated based on his/her current enrolled subjects. According to Dean Pama, the purpose of the deliberation was not to instill fear or to put excessive pressure to the graduating students but to help or aid them with their preparation by identifying the weakness of each student. He further said that it is not designed to hinder or prevent one from graduating but most importantly to create an impression that once a student had satisfactorily hurdled the deliberation process, there is a greater chance of Survival to the BAR exam.(The deliberation process was continued October 13 at 1pm)
As for the affected graduating students, the deliberation process is a bitter-sweet experience they must undergo because it was long time ago when the deliberation process was being exercise and precisely the process itself is a stranger that arrived with noble intentions. According to one of the graduating students, she is afraid and agitated with the deliberation because after the terrifying and brutal examinations they will be subjected to another rollercoaster ride.
In response Dean Pama, once said that for a graduating student to surpass the deliberation he/she must pass all his/her subjects with an allowable conditional mark (actually failing mark should be appropriate) of at least one (1) subject, more than that will cause one’s disqualification to graduate.
Simply put, the process was excruciatingly a mental torture for the graduating students, imagine studying to death to pass the final exam (may not be true to all) plus the agony of being in the pendulum of deliberation. For one perspective is visible graduating Law will take extra-ordinary effort, hard work and dedication spiced with mental, physical and psychological fatigue.
October 12 (around 10 a.m.) four professors namely Atty. Moslem for Commercial Law Review, Atty. Guiling for Remedial Law Review, Atty Norma Tanggol for Taxation Law Review and Dean Pama Muti for Civil Law Review 2 gathered to render a verdict to the 24 graduating students, the discussion was intense and scrutiny on each students’ class performance was of high magnitude. Each student is evaluated based on his/her current enrolled subjects. According to Dean Pama, the purpose of the deliberation was not to instill fear or to put excessive pressure to the graduating students but to help or aid them with their preparation by identifying the weakness of each student. He further said that it is not designed to hinder or prevent one from graduating but most importantly to create an impression that once a student had satisfactorily hurdled the deliberation process, there is a greater chance of Survival to the BAR exam.(The deliberation process was continued October 13 at 1pm)
As for the affected graduating students, the deliberation process is a bitter-sweet experience they must undergo because it was long time ago when the deliberation process was being exercise and precisely the process itself is a stranger that arrived with noble intentions. According to one of the graduating students, she is afraid and agitated with the deliberation because after the terrifying and brutal examinations they will be subjected to another rollercoaster ride.
In response Dean Pama, once said that for a graduating student to surpass the deliberation he/she must pass all his/her subjects with an allowable conditional mark (actually failing mark should be appropriate) of at least one (1) subject, more than that will cause one’s disqualification to graduate.
Simply put, the process was excruciatingly a mental torture for the graduating students, imagine studying to death to pass the final exam (may not be true to all) plus the agony of being in the pendulum of deliberation. For one perspective is visible graduating Law will take extra-ordinary effort, hard work and dedication spiced with mental, physical and psychological fatigue.